"Gender-Critical" Wins In Court. Here's Why It Falls Apart in Practice
Why misuse of biology leads to fewer rights for all
Skrmetti went their way. For Women Scotland went their way. But a "gender-critical" win on a category nobody can define doesn't govern anyone, and that's the whole problem.
Laws are intended to protect all people, not just the people in power right now. When laws are based on emotion, religion, and discrimination, they cannot and will not stand. History proves individual rights, not emotion, leads to fair governments.
Topics in this live stream:
☑️ Equality Fumble: why the UK Supreme Court didn't define "biological sex"
☑️ Religious War: why the US Supreme Court didn't define "transgender status"
☑️ No One Knows: why imprecise legal guidance leads to public inaction and apathy
☑️ Doing It Right: how Giggle vs Tickle differs from appeasing vocal minorities
The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the offical policy or position of The Purplepaw Clan, LLC. Please view the Disclaimer page for further information.